Applying for Jobs Where We Don’t Qualify – Pros and Cons – Asrar Qureshi’s Blog Post 992

Applying for Jobs Where We Don’t Qualify – Pros and Cons – Asrar Qureshi’s Blog Post 992

Dear Colleagues! This is Asrar Qureshi’s Blog Post 992 for Pharma Veterans. Pharma Veterans Blogs are published by Asrar Qureshi on its dedicated site https://pharmaveterans.com. Please email to aq.pharmaveterans@gmail.com for publishing your contributions here.

Image Created with Microsoft Designer

Image Created with Microsoft Designer

Put up any job ad in a newspaper, and it is likely the HR will receive hundreds of doses k., Via Email and post. They find it hard to screen this load and therefore depute the junior-most (mostly) staff to do the first screening. She/he rejects a huge number of applications on the basis of primary factors like education, age, experience, or even gender. If such a large-scale culling is not applied, it is found that lot of unrelated candidates have applied.

A finding from a Hewlett Packard internal report, that has been quoted in lean In. The Confidence Code, and a host of other articles goes like this: Men apply for a job when they meet only 60% of the qualifications, but women apply only if they meet 100% of them. We shall take up the merit of this in a separate post. In this blogpost, I shall talk about the advantages and disadvantages of applying without having required qualifications for the position, both for the individuals and organizations.

Pros of Men Applying Without Meeting All Criteria

Increased Opportunities

By applying for positions even when they don't meet all the qualifications, men may expose themselves to more opportunities. This proactive approach can lead to career advancement and new experiences that they might not have pursued otherwise. This is more likely if they survive the first screening or if the hiring manager is a risk-taker. 

Confidence and Risk-Taking

Men who apply despite not meeting all the criteria may demonstrate confidence and a willingness to take risks. This can be attractive to employers, as it signals a proactive and ambitious attitude. These traits are often associated with leadership potential and can lead to bigger or leadership roles. 

Learning and Growth

By stepping into roles that stretch their current abilities, men often gain new skills and knowledge on the job. This approach can lead to rapid personal and professional growth, as they learn by doing and overcoming challenges.

Cons of Men Applying Without Meeting All Criteria

Overconfidence

Applying for jobs without meeting the necessary qualifications can sometimes lead to situations where individuals are underprepared or overwhelmed by the demands of the role, i.e., if they are hired. Their overconfidence can result in poor performance, job dissatisfaction, and even dismissal.

Inefficiencies for Employers

Employers may spend time and resources interviewing candidates who are not actually qualified for the position. This can lead to inefficiencies in the hiring process and delays in filling the role with a suitable candidate. In the worst case, it may lead to a wrong hiring which is quite costly for the organization.

Perpetuation of Gender Imbalance

If men consistently apply for roles, they are underqualified for and also get hired, this can perpetuate a cycle where men occupy more positions of power, further widening the gender gap in leadership and high-stakes roles. It may also reinforce gender stereotypes about risk-taking and confidence.

Pros of Women Applying Only When They Meet Most Criteria

High Competence and Preparedness

Women who apply only when they meet most, or all of the criteria tend to be highly qualified for the positions they seek. This ensures they are well-prepared for the role, which can lead to strong job performance and job satisfaction.

Efficient Use of Employer Resources

Employers are more likely to interview candidates who are truly qualified when women apply selectively. This can streamline the hiring process and increase the chances of finding the right candidate quickly.

Commitment and Dedication

Women who apply selectively may do so with a higher degree of commitment and dedication to the roles they pursue. This can lead to lower turnover rates and higher employee retention for employers.

Cons of Women Applying Only When They Meet Most Criteria

Missed Opportunities

By waiting until they meet all the criteria, women may miss out on opportunities for career advancement. This cautious approach can limit their exposure to new challenges and experiences that could enhance their skills and professional growth.

Underrepresentation in Leadership Roles

Women's tendency to apply only when they meet most criteria may contribute to the underrepresentation of women in leadership and high-stakes roles. This hesitation can reinforce the gender gap in positions of power and influence within organizations.

Internalization of Gender Norms

The reluctance to apply unless fully qualified may stem from internalized societal norms and expectations around gender. This self-limiting behavior can hinder women's confidence and willingness to take risks, which are often necessary for career advancement.

Balancing the Tendencies

Encouraging a Growth Mindset

Both men and women can benefit from adopting a growth mindset, where they view challenges as opportunities for learning rather than obstacles. Encouraging women to apply even when they don’t meet all the criteria can help them gain more confidence and take more risks, while encouraging men to assess their readiness more critically can lead to better-prepared candidates.

Creating Supportive Work Environments

Organizations can create environments that encourage all employees, regardless of gender, to apply for roles where they can grow. This might include providing mentorship, offering training programs, and promoting a culture that values potential as well as experience.

Redesigning Job Descriptions

Employers can consider how job descriptions are written, ensuring that they don’t unintentionally discourage qualified candidates from applying. Phrasing job criteria as "preferred" rather than "required," or highlighting a willingness to train candidates who meet most of the criteria, can encourage more diverse applicants.

Sum Up

The diverse tendencies of men and women in applying for jobs have both positive and negative implications for individuals and organizations. While men may gain more opportunities through a bold, risk-taking approach, they may also face challenges if they are underprepared. On the other hand, women’s careful approach ensures they are well-prepared, but it can also limit their opportunities for advancement. By recognizing these tendencies and addressing the underlying causes, individuals can make more informed decisions, and organizations can foster a more inclusive and equitable hiring process.

Concluded.

Disclaimers: Pictures in these blogs are taken from free resources at Pexels, Pixabay, Unsplash, and Google. Credit is given where available. If a copyright claim is lodged, we shall remove the picture with appropriate regrets.

For most blogs, I research from several sources which are open to public. Their links are mentioned under references. There is no intent to infringe upon anyone’s copyrights. If, however, it happens unintentionally, I offer my sincere regrets.